Re: [HACKERS] Permissions and PGSQL

2004-01-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Monday 05 January 2004 12:51, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> Jean-Eric Cuendet wrote: > >>> - User permissions based on columns? > > > >> Well, I have about half a patch for column privileges lying around, but > >> I've never had eno

Re: [HACKERS] Permissions and PGSQL

2004-01-22 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Monday 05 January 2004 12:51, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> Jean-Eric Cuendet wrote: >>> - User permissions based on columns? > >> Well, I have about half a patch for column privileges lying around, but >> I've never had enough motivation to do the other

Re: [HACKERS] Permissions and PGSQL

2004-01-22 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Well, I have about half a patch for column privileges lying around, but I've never had enough motivation to do the other, more complicated half... Is there a TODO and TODO.detail warrented here? I thought views took care of this. Comments? They're needed for SQL99 anyway I think. Chris ---

Re: [HACKERS] Permissions and PGSQL

2004-01-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
Robert Treat wrote: > On Monday 05 January 2004 12:51, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Jean-Eric Cuendet wrote: > > > - User permissions based on columns? (Ex: User1 has Select on Column > > > "CompayName" but User2 has update on column "CompanyName" while User3 > > > has create new row on table). > >

Re: [HACKERS] Permissions and PGSQL

2004-01-11 Thread Robert Treat
On Monday 05 January 2004 12:51, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Jean-Eric Cuendet wrote: > > - User permissions based on columns? (Ex: User1 has Select on Column > > "CompayName" but User2 has update on column "CompanyName" while User3 > > has create new row on table). > > Well, I have about half a patc

Re: [HACKERS] Permissions and PGSQL

2004-01-05 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Jean-Eric Cuendet wrote: > - User permissions based on columns? (Ex: User1 has Select on Column > "CompayName" but User2 has update on column "CompanyName" while User3 > has create new row on table). Well, I have about half a patch for column privileges lying around, but I've never had enough mot

Re: [HACKERS] Permissions and PGSQL

2003-12-23 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 13:41:32 +0500, Jean-Eric Cuendet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > I use PgSql for a lot of our company's need and I lack some features. > I would like to know if there is plans to implement: > - User permissions based on columns? (Ex: User1 has Select on Column "CompayN

Re: [HACKERS] Permissions and PGSQL

2003-12-23 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
I use PgSql for a lot of our company's need and I lack some features. I would like to know if there is plans to implement: - User permissions based on columns? (Ex: User1 has Select on Column "CompayName" but User2 has update on column "CompanyName" while User3 has create new row on table). These d

[HACKERS] Permissions and PGSQL

2003-12-22 Thread Jean-Eric Cuendet
Hi, I use PgSql for a lot of our company's need and I lack some features. I would like to know if there is plans to implement: - User permissions based on columns? (Ex: User1 has Select on Column "CompayName" but User2 has update on column "CompanyName" while User3 has create new row on table). - P