If you are seeing very slow performance on a drive set, check dmesg to see
if you're getting SCSI bus errors or something similar. If your drives
aren't properly terminated then the performance will suffer a great deal.
---(end of broadcast)---
"Shridhar Daithankar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 26 Sep 2002 at 11:50, Mario Weilguni wrote:
>> Just an idea, I noticed you use char(10) for esn and min, and use this as
>> index. Are these really fixed len fields all having 10 bytes?
> 10 bytes. Those are id numbers.. like phone numbers al
On 26 Sep 2002 at 11:50, Mario Weilguni wrote:
> >Well the test runs were for 10GB of data. Schema is attached. Read in fixed
> >fonts..Last nullable fields are dummies but may be used in fututre and
> varchars
> >are not acceptable(Not my requirement). Tuple size is around 100 bytes..
> >The i
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 03:01:35PM +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
Content-Description: Mail message body
> The index creation query was
>
> CREATE INDEX index1 ON tablename (esn,min,datetime);
>
> What if I put datetime ahead? It's likely the the datetime field will have high
> degree of loc
>Well the test runs were for 10GB of data. Schema is attached. Read in fixed
>fonts..Last nullable fields are dummies but may be used in fututre and
varchars
>are not acceptable(Not my requirement). Tuple size is around 100 bytes..
>The index creation query was
>
>CREATE INDEX index1 ON tablenam
On 26 Sep 2002 at 11:17, Mario Weilguni wrote:
> On 26 Sep 2002 at 14:05, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> > Some time back I posted a query to build a site with 150GB of database. In
> last
> > couple of weeks, lots of things were tested at my place and there are some
> > results and again some co
On 26 Sep 2002 at 14:05, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> Some time back I posted a query to build a site with 150GB of database. In
last
> couple of weeks, lots of things were tested at my place and there are some
> results and again some concerns.
> 2) Creating index takes huge amount of time.
>
On 26 Sep 2002 at 10:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> it seems you have to cluster it, I don't think you have another choise.
Hmm.. That didn't occur to me...I guess some real time clustering like usogres
would do. Unless it turns out to be a performance hog..
But this is just insert a
On 26 Sep 2002 at 14:05, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> Some time back I posted a query to build a site with 150GB of database. In last
> couple of weeks, lots of things were tested at my place and there are some
> results and again some concerns.
> 2) Creating index takes huge amount of time.
>
Hello all,
Some time back I posted a query to build a site with 150GB of database. In last
couple of weeks, lots of things were tested at my place and there are some
results and again some concerns.
This is a long post. Please be patient and read thr. If we win this, I guess we
have a good m
10 matches
Mail list logo
