Re: [HACKERS] Pending 9.4 patches

2014-04-08 Thread Craig Ringer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/09/2014 09:28 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: > Ok. I'm going to make a serious effort to find time to work on > this, at least. Right now I'm busy preparing to launch a new site > (you'll see the announce in a couple days...), etc, etc, but I > shou

Re: [HACKERS] Pending 9.4 patches

2014-04-08 Thread Craig Ringer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/09/2014 01:54 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Gregory Smith >> wrote: >>> I have no other projects ahead of this for the remainder of >>> this month. I just can't figur

Re: [HACKERS] Pending 9.4 patches

2014-04-08 Thread Stephen Frost
* Craig Ringer (cr...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > On 04/09/2014 02:00 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: > > I'm a bit confused on this point- is the only issue the > > *preexisting* bug with security barrier views? > > This thread discusses two patches. The above refers to row security > (per quoted text at

Re: [HACKERS] Pending 9.4 patches

2014-04-08 Thread Craig Ringer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/09/2014 02:00 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: >>> Craig Ringer writes: > On 04/05/2014 03:57 AM, Andres Freund wrote: >>> r04) Row-security based on Updatable security barrier >>> views This one's fa

Re: [HACKERS] Pending 9.4 patches

2014-04-08 Thread Stephen Frost
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Craig Ringer writes: > > On 04/05/2014 03:57 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > >> r04) Row-security based on Updatable security barrier views > >> This one's fate seems to be hard to judge without c07. > > > Open issues remain with this patch, and resources for w

Re: [HACKERS] Pending 9.4 patches

2014-04-08 Thread Stephen Frost
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Gregory Smith > wrote: > > I have no other projects ahead of this for the remainder of this month. I > > just can't figure out what to do next until there's a committer (or > > committers, if someone else is going to

Re: [HACKERS] Pending 9.4 patches

2014-04-08 Thread Robert Haas
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Gregory Smith wrote: > I have no other projects ahead of this for the remainder of this month. I > just can't figure out what to do next until there's a committer (or > committers, if someone else is going to take on the locking bug) identified. > I looked at the

Re: [HACKERS] Pending 9.4 patches

2014-04-08 Thread Gregory Smith
On 4/7/14 2:59 AM, Craig Ringer wrote: On 04/05/2014 03:57 AM, Andres Freund wrote: c07) Updatable security barrier views. This needs a serious look by a committer. I've been exercising it via row security and it's been looking pretty solid. It isn't a huge or intrusive patch, and it's s

Re: [HACKERS] Pending 9.4 patches

2014-04-07 Thread Tom Lane
Craig Ringer writes: > On 04/05/2014 03:57 AM, Andres Freund wrote: >> r04) Row-security based on Updatable security barrier views >> This one's fate seems to be hard to judge without c07. > Open issues remain with this patch, and resources for working on it in > 9.4 have run out. > It is not re

Re: [HACKERS] Pending 9.4 patches

2014-04-07 Thread Craig Ringer
On 04/05/2014 03:57 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > c07) Updatable security barrier views. > This needs a serious look by a committer. I've been exercising it via row security and it's been looking pretty solid. It isn't a huge or intrusive patch, and it's seen several rounds of discussion durin

[HACKERS] Pending 9.4 patches

2014-04-04 Thread Andres Freund
Hi, I today tried to cleanup the state of the pending patches a bit. I hope I haven't bloodied too many toes. Here's a summary of all patches that aren't either committed, returned or rejected: Pending patches waiting for committer are: c01) Custom Scan APIs This really seems to need Tom's