On Wednesday 24 January 2001 20:37, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Here is another open item. What are we doing with LAZY vacuum?
Sorry for inserting in the middle. I would like to say that when I tried LAZY
vacuum on 7.0.3, I had a lockup on one of the table which disappeared after I
did usual vacuum
Here is another open item. What are we doing with LAZY vacuum?
> We recently had a very satisfactory contract completed by
> Vadim.
>
> Basically Vadim has been able to reduce the amount of time
> taken by a vacuum from 10-15 minutes down to under 10 seconds.
>
> We've been running with the
* Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010122 19:55] wrote:
>
> Vadim, did these patches ever make it into 7.1?
According to:
http://www.postgresql.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/parser/gram.y?rev=2.217&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup
nope. :(
>
> > We recently had a very satisfactory c
Vadim, did these patches ever make it into 7.1?
> We recently had a very satisfactory contract completed by
> Vadim.
>
> Basically Vadim has been able to reduce the amount of time
> taken by a vacuum from 10-15 minutes down to under 10 seconds.
>
> We've been running with these patches under h
* Peter Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010102 12:53] wrote:
> Will these patchsets be available to the public?
> I get:
> "You don't have permission to access /~alfred/vacfix/vlazy.tgz on this
> server"
>
> Thanks.
> Peter
>
>
> There's three patchsets and they are available at:
>
> http://peopl
* Tom Samplonius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001207 18:55] wrote:
>
> On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> > We recently had a very satisfactory contract completed by
> > Vadim.
> >
> > Basically Vadim has been able to reduce the amount of time
> > taken by a vacuum from 10-15 minutes down
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> We recently had a very satisfactory contract completed by
> Vadim.
>
> Basically Vadim has been able to reduce the amount of time
> taken by a vacuum from 10-15 minutes down to under 10 seconds.
...
What size database was that on?
I looking at
* Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001207 17:10] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Basically Vadim has been able to reduce the amount of time
> > taken by a vacuum from 10-15 minutes down to under 10 seconds.
>
> Cool. What's it do, exactly?
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Basically Vadim has been able to reduce the amount of time
> taken by a vacuum from 10-15 minutes down to under 10 seconds.
Cool. What's it do, exactly?
regards, tom lane
We recently had a very satisfactory contract completed by
Vadim.
Basically Vadim has been able to reduce the amount of time
taken by a vacuum from 10-15 minutes down to under 10 seconds.
We've been running with these patches under heavy load for
about a week now without any problems except one:
10 matches
Mail list logo
