On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
>> On Monday 21 December 2009 02:23:39 Robert Haas wrote:
>>> A more important point is whether we really need to make this
>>> dependent on Perl 5.6 or later.
>
>> I dont see a platform without perl 5.6 where a new enough
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On Monday 21 December 2009 04:23:57 Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andres Freund writes:
>> > On Monday 21 December 2009 02:23:39 Robert Haas wrote:
>> >> A more important point is whether we really need to make this
>> >> dependent on Perl 5.6 or later
On Monday 21 December 2009 04:23:57 Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On Monday 21 December 2009 02:23:39 Robert Haas wrote:
> >> A more important point is whether we really need to make this
> >> dependent on Perl 5.6 or later.
> >
> > I dont see a platform without perl 5.6 where a new
Andres Freund writes:
> On Monday 21 December 2009 02:23:39 Robert Haas wrote:
>> A more important point is whether we really need to make this
>> dependent on Perl 5.6 or later.
> I dont see a platform without perl 5.6 where a new enough flex/bison is
> available...
That argument only holds wa
Hi,
On Monday 21 December 2009 02:23:39 Robert Haas wrote:
> A more important point is whether we really need to make this
> dependent on Perl 5.6 or later. What features are we using here that
> actually require Perl 5.6? I suspect the answer is "none, but we
> don't like writing the code in a
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 7:20 PM, John Naylor wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Following up on my experimental patch last month to revamp the BKI
> infrastructure, I am proposing a less invasive set of changes with the
> hope of offering something committable. Some of these were discussed
> by Robert Haas a
