Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning triggers doc patch

2012-03-12 Thread Kevin Grittner
Jaime Casanova wrote: > is there any other place we can add a more detailed explanation? > so from your text after saying "usually there is no reason for" > you can add a parentesis saying "more info in " Sure, I'll look around for a good spot. -Kevin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list

Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning triggers doc patch

2012-03-12 Thread Jaime Casanova
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > > Do we really want to get into all that in the middle of step-by-step > instructions for the simple case? > is there any other place we can add a more detailed explanation? so from your text after saying "usually there is no reason for" y

Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning triggers doc patch

2012-03-12 Thread Kevin Grittner
Jaime Casanova wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Kevin Grittner > wrote: >> Attached is a doc patch based on a suggestion by Rural Hunter to >> address something he found confusing while setting up >> partitioning. >> >> Original thread is here: >> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql

Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning triggers doc patch

2012-03-12 Thread Jaime Casanova
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > Attached is a doc patch based on a suggestion by Rural Hunter to > address something he found confusing while setting up partitioning. > > Original thread is here: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-admin/2012-03/msg00066.php > you c

[HACKERS] Partitioning triggers doc patch

2012-03-12 Thread Kevin Grittner
Attached is a doc patch based on a suggestion by Rural Hunter to address something he found confusing while setting up partitioning. Original thread is here: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-admin/2012-03/msg00066.php -Kevin *** a/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml --- b/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml ***