For the patch: Patch to compute Max LSN of Data Pages
Reviewer has already given his opinion in mail at below link, that this is good
from his side and he has no more further concerns. He has one minor suggestion
which I also fixed in later provided patch.
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ca
On 03/04/2013 01:02 PM, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
> 2013/3/4 Craig Ringer :
>> - The SEPostgreSQL patches
>>
>> I still need to test this on Windows:
>>
> SEPostgreSQL is designed to perform on Linux with SELinux
> (security-enhanced Linux) feature enabled, because its design
> target is centralization o
2013/3/4 Craig Ringer :
> - The SEPostgreSQL patches
>
> I still need to test this on Windows:
>
SEPostgreSQL is designed to perform on Linux with SELinux
(security-enhanced Linux) feature enabled, because its design
target is centralization of access control rules between DBMS
and operating system
I've gone through all the Server Features entries and partway through the
performance category. So far:
"Writable Foreign Tables" is waiting for Tom to have a chance to check it out
and do some detailed work on it. Anyone else who wants to step in and help
might be able to improve its chances,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/04/2013 11:37 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>>> - Awaiting discussion of difficult issues:
>>> -- bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements
>> Small and difficult -> punt it, IMO.
>
> I'd really love to have this properly fixed in 9.3,
* Craig Ringer (cr...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> > - Awaiting discussion of syntax:
> > -- PL/PgSQL STRICT
I agree w/ Josh and Craig that this should probably be bounced- mainly
because we need to get 9.3 properly underway and this looks to continue
to be an area of much discussion.
> > -- Matview
On 03/04/2013 05:35 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Craig,
>
> Here's for your summary. I stopped at --echo-hidden, working my way up
> from the bottom. Overall, it seems like mostly the patches which are
> still in queue are there for good reasons, although there's probably a
> few things we could bou
Craig,
Here's for your summary. I stopped at --echo-hidden, working my way up
from the bottom. Overall, it seems like mostly the patches which are
still in queue are there for good reasons, although there's probably a
few things we could bounce if the authors don't respond in a couple days.
Wh
