Re: [HACKERS] Parameterization of partial path

2017-02-10 Thread Antonin Houska
Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Antonin Houska wrote: > > When looking at try_partial_hashjoin_path and try_partial_nestloop_path > > functions I'm failing to understand the comment "Parameterized partial paths > > are not supported.". > > > > It's clear to me that GatherPa

Re: [HACKERS] Parameterization of partial path

2017-02-10 Thread Amit Kapila
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Antonin Houska wrote: >> When looking at try_partial_hashjoin_path and try_partial_nestloop_path >> functions I'm failing to understand the comment "Parameterized partial paths >> are not supported.". >> >> It'

Re: [HACKERS] Parameterization of partial path

2017-02-09 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Antonin Houska wrote: > When looking at try_partial_hashjoin_path and try_partial_nestloop_path > functions I'm failing to understand the comment "Parameterized partial paths > are not supported.". > > It's clear to me that GatherPath can't have parameters because

[HACKERS] Parameterization of partial path

2017-02-09 Thread Antonin Houska
When looking at try_partial_hashjoin_path and try_partial_nestloop_path functions I'm failing to understand the comment "Parameterized partial paths are not supported.". It's clear to me that GatherPath can't have parameters because repeated execution of parallel plan with adjusted parameters is n