Re: [HACKERS] Parallel indicators not written by pg_get_functiondef

2016-04-27 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Feike Steenbergen wrote: > This patch is redundant as of commit > 2ac3be2e763d9b971352819f285dd51519e0aeb9 > > (Ashutosh Sharma diagnosed and patched the same problem) Oops. I completely failed to notice this prior report. Sorry about that. -- Robert Haas Ente

Re: [HACKERS] Parallel indicators not written by pg_get_functiondef

2016-04-27 Thread Feike Steenbergen
This patch is redundant as of commit 2ac3be2e763d9b971352819f285dd51519e0aeb9 (Ashutosh Sharma diagnosed and patched the same problem) On 15 April 2016 at 14:13, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:48 PM, Feike Steenbergen > wrote: > > pg_get_functiondef(oid) does not return the

Re: [HACKERS] Parallel indicators not written by pg_get_functiondef

2016-04-15 Thread Michael Paquier
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:48 PM, Feike Steenbergen wrote: > pg_get_functiondef(oid) does not return the PARALLEL indicators. > > Attached a small patch to have pg_get_functiondef actually add these > indicators, using commit 7aea8e4f2 (pg_dump.c) as a guide. > > The logic is the same as with the v

[HACKERS] Parallel indicators not written by pg_get_functiondef

2016-04-15 Thread Feike Steenbergen
pg_get_functiondef(oid) does not return the PARALLEL indicators. Attached a small patch to have pg_get_functiondef actually add these indicators, using commit 7aea8e4f2 (pg_dump.c) as a guide. The logic is the same as with the volatility: we only append non-default indicators. Feike Steenbergen