On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Now that we have prepared statements, should the foreign key code be changed
> to use them? I think it's highly likely that they will be reused in a
> connection. Might be an idea.
It might be worth doing eventually just to standardize, but
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now that we have prepared statements, should the foreign key code be changed
> to use them? I think it's highly likely that they will be reused in a
> connection. Might be an idea.
Waste of time; the FK code already does this for itself.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 02:53:46PM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>
> Now that we have prepared statements, should the foreign key code be changed
> to use them? I think it's highly likely that they will be reused in a
> connection. Might be an idea.
No FK, but more common is integrate
Hi,
Now that we have prepared statements, should the foreign key code be changed
to use them? I think it's highly likely that they will be reused in a
connection. Might be an idea.
Also, what if the person wants to prepare a view? Should they have to
PREPARE or should we automatically prepar
