On 8/27/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've applied a patch along these lines. David's plperl example now does
what (I think) he expected.
Kewl. Thanks Tom.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1300
EnterpriseDB Corporation| fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood
"Jonah H. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 8/24/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This reminds me of a consideration I had been intending to bring up on
>> the mailing lists: what exactly do we want to do with the SPI API for
>> RETURNING queries?
> I like adding RETURNING-specifi
On 8/24/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This reminds me of a consideration I had been intending to bring up on
the mailing lists: what exactly do we want to do with the SPI API for
RETURNING queries? The current behavior is that it still returns
SPI_OK_INSERT and so on, but also creates
Tom Lane wrote:
Another issue I noted in that same area is that spi.c does not set
SPI_processed for a utility statement, even if the utility statement
returns tuples. Is this a bug, or should we leave it alone?
Bug or not, it's at least a limitation we could do without, I think.
cheers
David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I've found a little lacuna in the RETURNING feature, that being in
>> PL/Perl's spi_prepare()/spi_execute_prepared() as illustrated in the
>> attached file on CVS TIP.
It looks like plperl_spi_execute_fetch_result only expects to find
tuples returned if
David Fetter wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 11:31:02AM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
Folks,
I've found a little lacuna in the RETURNING feature, that being in
PL/Perl's spi_prepare()/spi_execute_prepared() as illustrated in the
attached file on CVS TIP.
I think that fixing this is a matter of
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 11:31:02AM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I've found a little lacuna in the RETURNING feature, that being in
> PL/Perl's spi_prepare()/spi_execute_prepared() as illustrated in the
> attached file on CVS TIP.
>
> I think that fixing this is a matter of post-RETURNI
Folks,
I've found a little lacuna in the RETURNING feature, that being in
PL/Perl's spi_prepare()/spi_execute_prepared() as illustrated in the
attached file on CVS TIP.
I think that fixing this is a matter of post-RETURNING-patch cleanup.
What else might not know about RETURNING that needs to?
C
