On 26 Leden 2012, 14:44, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 20:12, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> On 21 Leden 2012, 18:13, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 18:02, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>> Though I just looked at the tabstat code again, and we already split
>>> that message
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 20:12, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 21 Leden 2012, 18:13, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 18:02, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> Though I just looked at the tabstat code again, and we already split
>> that message up at regular intervals. Which would make it quite wei
On 21 Leden 2012, 18:13, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 18:02, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> On 20 Leden 2012, 13:23, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> I'm wondering if this (and also my deadlocks stats patch that's int he
>>> queue) should instead of inventing new pgstats messages, add fields
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 18:02, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 20 Leden 2012, 13:23, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 21:39, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>> On 20.12.2011 19:59, Tomas Vondra wrote:
On 20.12.2011 11:20, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> 2011/12/20 Tomas Vondra :
>>
>> I
On 20 Leden 2012, 13:23, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 21:39, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> On 20.12.2011 19:59, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>> On 20.12.2011 11:20, Magnus Hagander wrote:
2011/12/20 Tomas Vondra :
>
> I haven't updated the docs yet - let's see if the patch is acc
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 21:39, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 20.12.2011 19:59, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> On 20.12.2011 11:20, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> 2011/12/20 Tomas Vondra :
I haven't updated the docs yet - let's see if the patch is acceptable at
all first.
>>>
>>> Again, without havin
On 20.12.2011 19:59, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 20.12.2011 11:20, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> 2011/12/20 Tomas Vondra :
>>>
>>> I haven't updated the docs yet - let's see if the patch is acceptable at
>>> all first.
>>
>> Again, without having reviewed the code, this looks like a feature
>> we'd want,
On 20.12.2011 11:20, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> 2011/12/20 Tomas Vondra :
>>
>> I haven't updated the docs yet - let's see if the patch is acceptable at
>> all first.
>
> Again, without having reviewed the code, this looks like a feature
> we'd want, so please add some docs, and then submit it for t
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:45, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 20 Prosinec 2011, 11:20, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> 2011/12/20 Tomas Vondra :
>>>
>>> I haven't updated the docs yet - let's see if the patch is acceptable at
>>> all first.
>>
>> Again, without having reviewed the code, this looks like a feat
On 20 Prosinec 2011, 11:20, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> 2011/12/20 Tomas Vondra :
>>
>> I haven't updated the docs yet - let's see if the patch is acceptable at
>> all first.
>
> Again, without having reviewed the code, this looks like a feature
> we'd want, so please add some docs, and then submit it
2011/12/20 Tomas Vondra :
> Hello everybody,
>
> this patch adds two counters to pg_stat_database to track temporary
> files - number of temp files and number of bytes. I see this as a useful
> feature, as temporary files often cause a lot of IO (because of low
> work_mem etc.). The log_temp_files
Hello everybody,
this patch adds two counters to pg_stat_database to track temporary
files - number of temp files and number of bytes. I see this as a useful
feature, as temporary files often cause a lot of IO (because of low
work_mem etc.). The log_temp_files is useful, but you have to parse the
12 matches
Mail list logo