Tom Lane wrote:
> I seem to recall that there was some special consideration for files
> that would conditionally show up in multiple executables. Or were
> you going to fix that by having just one .mo file for all the
> clients?
The current method is to explicitly register the source file in eac
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Should it be gettext'ified?
> Probably.
I seem to recall that there was some special consideration for files
that would conditionally show up in multiple executables. Or were you
going to fix that by having just one .mo file for a
Tom Lane wrote:
> I just noticed that our port/getopt_long.c substitute implementation
> does not accept abbreviated names for long options:
That is known, but since we don't advertise that feature, it's not a
problem.
> Barring objections, I'm going to modify our version to allow unique
> abbre
I just noticed that our port/getopt_long.c substitute implementation
does not accept abbreviated names for long options:
$ pg_dump --username tgl regression
... works ...
$ pg_dump --user tgl regression
pg_dump: illegal option -- user
Try "pg_dump --help" for more information.
$
The GNU implement