Greg Smith wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > We are not very good at _removing_ functionality/GUCs, and based on the
> > discussion so far, I think there is a very slim chance we would get it
> > right for 9.0, which is why I suggested converting it to a boolean and
> > revisiting this for 9.1.
> >
Bruce Momjian wrote:
We are not very good at _removing_ functionality/GUCs, and based on the
discussion so far, I think there is a very slim chance we would get it
right for 9.0, which is why I suggested converting it to a boolean and
revisiting this for 9.1.
There's some feedback you can on
Simon Riggs wrote:
I've refrained from comment on max_standby_delay because I have
neither read the patch nor am likely to be an early adopter of HS;
however, as a potential eventual user I have to say that the
semantics for this GUC proposed by Simon seem sane and useful to me.
Certainly the d
