Dave Page wrote:
Justin? We can write a techdocs styled search/results page quite easily
if you like that will use the same database, and filter to techdocs only
if that's preferred. It would be nice to get rid of Google.
Agreed. It would be better to have Dave improved search engine do it.
A
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Copeland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 31 January 2003 19:45
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Odd website behavior...
>
>
> > Or do you mean the old Google one?
>
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 13:28, Dave Page wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Greg Copeland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 31 January 2003 16:12
> > To: PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List
> > Subject: [HACKERS] Odd website behavior..
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Copeland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 31 January 2003 16:12
> To: PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List
> Subject: [HACKERS] Odd website behavior...
>
>
> When searching techdocs.postgresql.org, if you type in
> &q
When searching techdocs.postgresql.org, if you type in "transaction", it
says, "Your original search: transation returned zero results. The
alternate spelling: transaction returned the results below." For some
reason it is changing the spelling and then reverting back to the
original.
Just a hea
