On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Etsuro Fujita
wrote:
>> It was left there intentionally to document all the conditions in one
>> place (some from the core and some from the FDW itself), for a ready
>> reference. In case tomorrow core thinks that matching user mapping is
>> not required, postgres_
On 2016/03/14 16:42, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Etsuro Fujita
mailto:fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp>> wrote:
Here is the comments for foreign_join_ok in postgres_fdw.c:
/*
* Assess whether the join between inner and outer relations can be
pushed down
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Etsuro Fujita
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the comments for foreign_join_ok in postgres_fdw.c:
>
> /*
> * Assess whether the join between inner and outer relations can be
> pushed down
> * to the foreign server. As a side effect, save information we obtain
> in this
Hi,
Here is the comments for foreign_join_ok in postgres_fdw.c:
/*
* Assess whether the join between inner and outer relations can be
pushed down
* to the foreign server. As a side effect, save information we obtain
in this
* function to PgFdwRelationInfo passed in.
*
* Joins that satisfy co
