Tom Lane wrote:
>
> "Hiroshi Inoue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Does removing pre-6.4 code improve the status ?
>
> Yes, it does (IMHO anyway) because it removes a configuration option
> that is confusing new users.
Right. There's even an idea(not mine) to remove
the option by automatically
"Hiroshi Inoue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does removing pre-6.4 code improve the status ?
Yes, it does (IMHO anyway) because it removes a configuration option
that is confusing new users. The odds that someone will want to use 7.1
ODBC with a pre-6.4 server seem very small to me, while we do
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bruce Momjian
> > Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 11:01 AM
> > To: PostgreSQL-development
> > Subject: [HACKERS] ODBC backward versions
> >
> >
> > I checked the logs, and we released the new 6.4 backend
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian
> Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 11:01 AM
> To: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: [HACKERS] ODBC backward versions
>
>
> I checked the logs, and we released the new 6.4 backend protocol on
> 1998-10-30. That
I checked the logs, and we released the new 6.4 backend protocol on
1998-10-30. That was 2.5 years ago.
We normally allow older clients to communicate with newer servers, but
often we don't support newer clients talking to older servers, sometimes
even servers one release in the past. The reaso