Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think the first step is to install the zic binary along the rest of
> > the stuff, so that a user without the source tree can compile the tzdata
> > package. Unless the compiled representation is portable, which I kinda
> > doubt?
Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I think the first step is to install the zic binary along the rest of
the stuff, so that a user without the source tree can compile the tzdata
package. Unless the compiled representation is portable, which I kinda
doubt?
Actually, it
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think the first step is to install the zic binary along the rest of
> the stuff, so that a user without the source tree can compile the tzdata
> package. Unless the compiled representation is portable, which I kinda
> doubt?
Actually, it is. In fact
Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Another interesting questions are what postgres does when timezone files
> are changed? Does it need SIGHUP to invoke rereading? What is impact on
> current running transaction when tz file is changed?
This falls into the category of "get a life". The
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
I think the first step is to install the zic binary along the rest of
the stuff, so that a user without the source tree can compile the tzdata
package. Unless the compiled representation is portable, which I kinda
doubt?
Ma
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
I think the first step is to install the zic binary along the rest of
the stuff, so that a user without the source tree can compile the tzdata
package. Unless the compiled representation is portable, which I kinda
doubt?
Maybe wild idea, what's a
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 14:23 +0100, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 09:25 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >>> Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> >> I think we need so
Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 09:25 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
I think we need some different mechanism how to deliver timezone updated.
Even when the system TZ is not use
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
I think the first step is to install the zic binary along the rest of
the stuff, so that a user without the source tree can compile the tzdata
package. Unless the compiled representation is portable, which I kinda
doubt?
Maybe wild idea, what's about use buildfarm to up
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 09:25 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> > >>> I think we need some different mechanism how to deliver timezone
> > >>> updated.
> > >
> > >> Even when the
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> >>> I think we need some different mechanism how to deliver timezone updated.
> >
> >> Even when the system TZ is not used, we could deliver our "zic"
> >> executable (pgzic?) and l
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 10:04 +, Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 02:56 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> >> Be fair --- the USA did give us a couple years' notice.
> >
> > Not for the latest changes, IIRC.
>
> It didn't match my rec
"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 02:56 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Be fair --- the USA did give us a couple years' notice.
>
> Not for the latest changes, IIRC.
It didn't match my recollection either. But apparently Tom is almost right.
The Energy Policy Act
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 02:56 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 02:26 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Plan B would be to take out contracts on all the banana-republic
> >> politicians who think that changing DST laws with a month's notice
> >>
Tom Lane wrote:
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 02:26 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Plan B would be to take out contracts on all the banana-republic
politicians who think that changing DST laws with a month's notice
is a pleasant pastime. I fear we lack the resources
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 02:26 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Plan B would be to take out contracts on all the banana-republic
>> politicians who think that changing DST laws with a month's notice
>> is a pleasant pastime. I fear we lack the resources for that
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 02:26 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 05:46:08PM -0800, Trevor Talbot wrote:
> >> I've been wondering lately why it isn't just stored in the database
> >> somewhere.
>
> > That's a different question. One reas
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 05:46:08PM -0800, Trevor Talbot wrote:
>> I've been wondering lately why it isn't just stored in the database
>> somewhere.
> That's a different question. One reason is that we wanted files compatible
> with the stuff that was
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 05:46:08PM -0800, Trevor Talbot wrote:
> On 11/8/07, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > > Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > >> Are Windows users accustomed to having up-to-the-minute timezone
> > >> information? Maybe there's something I don't
On 11/8/07, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Are Windows users accustomed to having up-to-the-minute timezone
> >> information? Maybe there's something I don't know about Microsoft's
> >> update practices, but I would have thought that t
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> Are Windows users accustomed to having up-to-the-minute timezone
>> information? Maybe there's something I don't know about Microsoft's
>> update practices, but I would have thought that the expectations on that
>> platform would be pretty darn l
Tom Lane wrote:
Are Windows users accustomed to having up-to-the-minute timezone
information? Maybe there's something I don't know about Microsoft's
update practices, but I would have thought that the expectations on that
platform would be pretty darn low.
No, they push updates fairly
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> For people using prebuilt packages, it's really the packager's problem.
>> I think most packagers are going to move to depending on a system
>> timezone DB if at all possible.
> Still need a solution for those where it's not possible
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>>> I think we need some different mechanism how to deliver timezone updated.
>
>> Even when the system TZ is not used, we could deliver our "zic"
>> executable (pgzic?) and let the user drop the latest tzdata so
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>> I think we need some different mechanism how to deliver timezone updated.
> Even when the system TZ is not used, we could deliver our "zic"
> executable (pgzic?) and let the user drop the latest tzdata somewhere
> and recompile
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Devrim GÜNDÜZ napsal(a):
>> Hi,
>> ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/tzdata2007i.tar.gz
>> Per announcement:
>> "...is now available; this reflects changes for Cuba and Syria
>> circulated earlier this week on the time zone mailing list.
>> There are no code changes, so there's no
Devrim GÜNDÜZ napsal(a):
Hi,
ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/tzdata2007i.tar.gz
Per announcement:
"...is now available; this reflects changes for Cuba and Syria
circulated earlier this week on the time zone mailing list.
There are no code changes, so there's no tzcode2007i; tzcood2007h
remains cu
Hi,
ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/tzdata2007i.tar.gz
Per announcement:
"...is now available; this reflects changes for Cuba and Syria
circulated earlier this week on the time zone mailing list.
There are no code changes, so there's no tzcode2007i; tzcood2007h
remains current."
Regards,
--
Devri
28 matches
Mail list logo
