Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think creating a new LWLockId (BTFreeListLock?) can help here. The
> operations on freelist are short lived and rather infrequent so it
> doesn't seem to matter that it is global to all indexes.
Seems like a really bad idea to me ... what makes you
On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 08:25:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>> It seems to me I'll have to add some amount of lock types
> >>> in the lock manager. Does that bother you?
> >>
> >> Such as?
>
> > There are three new lock modes: R, RX and RS (Reorgani
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> It seems to me I'll have to add some amount of lock types
>>> in the lock manager. Does that bother you?
>>
>> Such as?
> There are three new lock modes: R, RX and RS (Reorganizer, Reorganizer
> Exclusive and Reorganizer Shared). Actually, they ar
En Fri, 04 Oct 2002 17:58:06 -0400
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm looking at implementing the btree reorganizer described in "On-line
> > reorganization of sparsely-...", ACM SIGMOD proceedings 1996, by Zou and
> > Salzberg.
The title
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm looking at implementing the btree reorganizer described in "On-line
> reorganization of sparsely-...", ACM SIGMOD proceedings 1996, by Zou and
> Salzberg. It seems to me I'll have to add some amount of lock types
> in the lock manager. Does that b
Hello hackers,
I'm looking at implementing the btree reorganizer described in "On-line
reorganization of sparsely-...", ACM SIGMOD proceedings 1996, by Zou and
Salzberg. It seems to me I'll have to add some amount of lock types
in the lock manager. Does that bother you?
--
Alvaro Herrera ()
"
