On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 08:10:24PM -0700, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> Don't know about Solaris 9/sparc yet -- the whole dance takes over
> an hour on my (t)rusty ol' Ultra 1.
Solaris 9/sparc passes all tests.
--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
---(end of broadcast)--
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 08:35:40PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Okay, I committed some tweaks to reduce platform dependencies. I get
> passes now on all three platforms I have handy.
It passes on my FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE box.
Don't know about Solaris 9/sparc yet -- the whole dance takes over
an hour
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am seeing the following regression failures with CVS head and
> > inheritance tests. They look like sort order problems:
>
> Does it go away if you initdb? I suspect the size of pg_class is a
> factor in the choice of plan for tha
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Does it go away if you initdb? I suspect the size of pg_class is a
> >> factor in the choice of plan for that query. You seem to still be
> >> getting the old plan ...
>
> > An initdb does not change the regress
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmph. I'm unsure why there's a platform dependency there, but we should
>> probably just add an ORDER BY to suppress it. Will do.
> Why did it just appear? Optimizer changes in the past few days?
I did just change the planner, but
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Does it go away if you initdb? I suspect the size of pg_class is a
>> factor in the choice of plan for that query. You seem to still be
>> getting the old plan ...
> An initdb does not change the regression failure. Sorry.
Hmph. I
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I am seeing the following regression failures with CVS head and
>> inheritance tests. They look like sort order problems:
> I see regression test failures in both inheritence and join (after a
> fresh initdb).
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I see regression test failures in both inheritence and join (after a
> fresh initdb). Attached is the regression.diffs, gzip'ed.
Yeah, so do I on a Linux machine. It looks like the dynamic size
estimates are highlighting some platform dependencies, such a
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 17:22 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am seeing the following regression failures with CVS head and
> > inheritance tests. They look like sort order problems:
>
> Does it go away if you initdb? I suspect the size of pg_class is a
> f
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am seeing the following regression failures with CVS head and
> inheritance tests. They look like sort order problems:
Does it go away if you initdb? I suspect the size of pg_class is a
factor in the choice of plan for that query. You seem to still
I am seeing the following regression failures with CVS head and
inheritance tests. They look like sort order problems:
---
*** ./expected/inherit.out Wed Dec 1 16:53:51 2004
--- ./results/inherit.out Wed Dec 1
11 matches
Mail list logo
