On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:00:52PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> David Fetter wrote:
> >On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 04:40:22PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >>Hackers, Driver maintainers,
> >>
> >>The 9.0 "don't rename index cols" behavior has already broken JDBC. We
> >>need to get in touch with
David Fetter wrote:
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 04:40:22PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
Hackers, Driver maintainers,
The 9.0 "don't rename index cols" behavior has already broken JDBC. We
need to get in touch with other driver authors to see if they are
affected by this, and to let them know tha
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 04:40:22PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Hackers, Driver maintainers,
>
> The 9.0 "don't rename index cols" behavior has already broken JDBC. We
> need to get in touch with other driver authors to see if they are
> affected by this, and to let them know that they'll need a n
Hackers, Driver maintainers,
The 9.0 "don't rename index cols" behavior has already broken JDBC. We
need to get in touch with other driver authors to see if they are
affected by this, and to let them know that they'll need a new driver
release for 9.0, if so.
--
