On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-06-05 16:56:08 +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> > Do we need to back-patch this to older versions (i,e. 9.2, 9.1, ..)?
>> >
>>
>> Yes, this should be backpatched to 9.2, 9.1, 9.0, too
On 2014-06-05 16:56:08 +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > Do we need to back-patch this to older versions (i,e. 9.2, 9.1, ..)?
> >
>
> Yes, this should be backpatched to 9.2, 9.1, 9.0, too.
I don't think it really needs to go to 9.0 - that didn't
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Amit Langote wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Amit Langote
>>> wrote:
Hi,
Following (commit 2985e16) has not been backpatched, I
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Amit Langote wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Amit Langote wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Following (commit 2985e16) has not been backpatched, I guess.
>>>
>>> ANALYZE hs1;
>>> -ERROR: cannot execute VACUUM
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Amit Langote wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Following (commit 2985e16) has not been backpatched, I guess.
>>
>> ANALYZE hs1;
>> -ERROR: cannot execute VACUUM during recovery
>> +ERROR: cannot execute ANALYZE during reco
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Amit Langote wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following (commit 2985e16) has not been backpatched, I guess.
>
> ANALYZE hs1;
> -ERROR: cannot execute VACUUM during recovery
> +ERROR: cannot execute ANALYZE during recovery
>
> Attached is a patch for this.
Why did you cut off th
Hi,
Following (commit 2985e16) has not been backpatched, I guess.
ANALYZE hs1;
-ERROR: cannot execute VACUUM during recovery
+ERROR: cannot execute ANALYZE during recovery
Attached is a patch for this.
--
Amit
hs-regress-expected-out-typo-fix-backpatch.patch
Description: Binary data
--
S
