Re: [HACKERS] NOCREATETABLE patch (was: Re: Please, help!(about Postgres))

2001-05-09 Thread Karel Zak
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 02:48:11PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Can someone remind me what we are going to do with this? > > > This patch add to 7.0.2 code NOCREATETABLE and NOLOCKTABLE feature: It's my old patch, it's usable and some people use it for 7.0.x. But it's really temporary sol

AW: [HACKERS] NOCREATETABLE patch (was: Re: Please, help!(about Postgres))

2001-05-09 Thread Zeugswetter Andreas SB
> > The connect group would be granted these System Privileges: If we keep it like others (e.g. Informix) this System Privilege would be called "resource". I like this name better, because it more describes the detailed priviledges. > > > > CREATE AGGREGATE privilege > > CREATE INDEX privileg

Re: [HACKERS] NOCREATETABLE patch (was: Re: Please, help!(about Postgres))

2001-05-07 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can someone remind me what we are going to do with this? I'd like to see some effort put into implementing the SQL-standard privilege model, rather than adding yet more ad-hoc user properties. The more of these we make, the more painful it's going to be

[HACKERS] NOCREATETABLE patch (was: Re: Please, help!(about Postgres))

2001-01-29 Thread Karel Zak
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, [koi8-r] íÁËÓÉÍ í. đĎĚŃËĎ× wrote: > Good Day, Dear Karel Zak! > > Please, forgive me for my bad english and if i do not right with your > day time. my English is more poor :-) You are right, it is (was?) in TODO and it will implemented - I hope - in some next rele