On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:53 AM, James Sewell wrote:
> What is needed to support this is the ability to configure Px with something
> like:
>
> 1 (P1, P2, P3), 1 (D1, D2, D3)
>
> Would there be any appetite for this - or would it be seen as over
> complication of the current rules?
There have
Hello,
When working with a production (P) and a DR (D) environment it is often a
requirement to be able to protect against data loss when promoting within a
site, and also when losing A and promoting a master at D.
The current synchronous_standby_names do not allow this.
In a simple example we c
