Peter Eisentraut writes:
> The new MultiXactId concept appears in a number of user-facing error
> messages, including in the scary context of transaction ID wraparound,
> so it seems kind of important, but it doesn't appear to be documented in
> any user-facing places. Should this be rectified?
Hi,
On 2013-08-07 21:25:06 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The new MultiXactId concept appears in a number of user-facing error
> messages, including in the scary context of transaction ID wraparound,
> so it seems kind of important, but it doesn't appear to be documented in
> any user-facing pl
The new MultiXactId concept appears in a number of user-facing error
messages, including in the scary context of transaction ID wraparound,
so it seems kind of important, but it doesn't appear to be documented in
any user-facing places. Should this be rectified? Maybe some of the
material from RE
