Tom,
> Speaking of which, is a list of those registered posted anywhere? I
> looked for one the other day because I wanted to double-check that
> I was registered, but couldn't find anything on the website.
No, I think there would be some privacy issues with that. You're
registered. You sho
Josh Berkus writes:
> You and Bruce might want to think about *registering* for the conference.
Speaking of which, is a list of those registered posted anywhere? I
looked for one the other day because I wanted to double-check that
I was registered, but couldn't find anything on the website.
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Luke,
>
> > Ayush and I (along with Brian Hagenbuch) also plan to be in Toronto, so
> > we can help as needed.
>
> You and Bruce might want to think about *registering* for the conference.
I thought I did already. I filled something out a few months ago.
Anyway, it now say
Luke,
> Ayush and I (along with Brian Hagenbuch) also plan to be in Toronto, so
> we can help as needed.
You and Bruce might want to think about *registering* for the conference.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
---(end of broadcast)
Bruce, Tom, Andrew,
On 6/14/06 11:06 AM, "Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The running of extra tests outside our standard regression set will be
> one of the topics discussed during my session in Toronto. I don't mind
> having them stored elsewhere, although it will make things a bit
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian writes:
Where are we on this? Should we just add a URL to the full 1MB test files?
Adding an MB to the distribution for tests that hardly anyone needs to
run is surely not a good idea. What about putting them on pgfoundry
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Where are we on this? Should we just add a URL to the full 1MB test files?
>
> Adding an MB to the distribution for tests that hardly anyone needs to
> run is surely not a good idea. What about putting them on pgfoundry and
> then putting a link to th
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Where are we on this? Should we just add a URL to the full 1MB test files?
Adding an MB to the distribution for tests that hardly anyone needs to
run is surely not a good idea. What about putting them on pgfoundry and
then putting a link to that somewhere in the docs?
Where are we on this? Should we just add a URL to the full 1MB test files?
---
Ayush Parashar wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am new to this list.
>
> I have made some additions to multi-byte regression tests ( ./src/test/mb),
>
Hi there,
I am new to this list.
I have made some additions to multi-byte regression tests ( ./src/test/mb),
to include regression tests for copy command. This can be used to test
multi-byte extensions of postgresql and client character encoding, for copy
command. The test uses the following comp
10 matches
Mail list logo
