Re: [HACKERS] Mostly Harmless: c++bookends - patch 2 of 4

2009-07-16 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Thursday 16 July 2009 17:00:03 Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > So I think either decoration is added to all of these files or none of > > them. And I think the former is not going to go over well. > > We do have some things that are conditioned o

Re: [HACKERS] Mostly Harmless: c++bookends - patch 2 of 4

2009-07-16 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > So I think either decoration is added to all of these files or none of them. > And I think the former is not going to go over well. We do have some things that are conditioned on __cplusplus already, such as "c.h", "pg_config.h.in", and "p

Re: [HACKERS] Mostly Harmless: c++bookends - patch 2 of 4

2009-07-13 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Friday 05 December 2008 11:16:37 Kurt Harriman wrote: > Just a few additional header files are mentioned in the PostgreSQL > Reference Manual for add-on developers to use: fmgr.h, funcapi.h, > and spi.h. This patch adds bookends within those three files for > the benefit of begin

Re: [HACKERS] Mostly Harmless: c++bookends - patch 2 of 4

2008-12-05 Thread Kurt Harriman
(Re-sending just the second of four patches: c++bookends) These patches are based on CVS head in which the latest commit was user:petere date:Thu Dec 04 17:51:28 2008 + summary: Default values for function arguments 2. c++bookends C++ code can call C functions and