Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Fixing it would be trivial, I'm sure, but is it really a problem?
> The "char" data type which I was mistakenly using is enough of a wart that it
> probably doesn't matter what we do with it. There aren't a
"Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gregory Stark wrote:
>> Also, I thought we said this would be an error:
>>
>> postgres=# select length("char"(0));
>> length
>> 0
>> (1 row)
>>
>>
>
> IIRC, we said chr(0) would give you an error, and it does. I don't recall any
> d
Gregory Stark wrote:
Also, I thought we said this would be an error:
postgres=# select length("char"(0));
length
0
(1 row)
IIRC, we said chr(0) would give you an error, and it does. I don't
recall any discussion of "char"(0), but no doubt a few brain cells have
died s
Also, I thought we said this would be an error:
postgres=# select length("char"(0));
length
0
(1 row)
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL
training!
