Re: [HACKERS] More Prelimiary DBT-2 Test Results with PostgreSQL

2003-10-06 Thread markw
On 24 Sep, Greg Stark wrote: > Ok, I guess I misunderstood you. These queries are taking 0.5ms - 300ms except > for the last aggregate query which takes just over 1s. http://developer.osdl.org/markw/dbt2-pgsql/120/ I have more data where I got the response times for each transaction much lower by

Re: [HACKERS] More Prelimiary DBT-2 Test Results with PostgreSQL

2003-09-25 Thread markw
On 25 Sep, Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote: > >> > >> > Are those response times in the right unit? 7-10s? >> > >> > No problem: http://developer.osdl.org/markw/misc/plana.out >> >> Ok, I guess I misunderstood you. These queries are taking 0.5ms - 300ms except >> for the last aggregate query whic

Re: [HACKERS] More Prelimiary DBT-2 Test Results with PostgreSQL 7.3.4

2003-09-25 Thread Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
> > >> > Are those response times in the right unit? 7-10s? > > > > No problem: http://developer.osdl.org/markw/misc/plana.out > > Ok, I guess I misunderstood you. These queries are taking 0.5ms - 300ms except > for the last aggregate query which takes just over 1s. Yes, but because this is a be

Re: [HACKERS] More Prelimiary DBT-2 Test Results with PostgreSQL 7.3.4

2003-09-24 Thread Greg Stark
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On 24 Sep, Greg Stark wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > >> On 22 Sep, Greg Stark wrote: > >> > Are those response times in the right unit? 7-10s? > > No problem: http://developer.osdl.org/markw/misc/plana.out Ok, I guess I misunderstood you. These queries are

Re: [HACKERS] More Prelimiary DBT-2 Test Results with PostgreSQL

2003-09-24 Thread markw
On 24 Sep, Greg Stark wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> On 22 Sep, Greg Stark wrote: >> > Are those response times in the right unit? 7-10s? >> >> The plans (http://developer.osdl.org/markw/74/db/plan0.out) don't show >> any table scans. They appears to be mostly index scans. There aren't

Re: [HACKERS] More Prelimiary DBT-2 Test Results with PostgreSQL 7.3.4

2003-09-24 Thread Greg Stark
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On 22 Sep, Greg Stark wrote: > > Are those response times in the right unit? 7-10s? > > The plans (http://developer.osdl.org/markw/74/db/plan0.out) don't show > any table scans. They appears to be mostly index scans. There aren't > any batch updates. Would it be eas

Re: [HACKERS] More Prelimiary DBT-2 Test Results with PostgreSQL

2003-09-24 Thread markw
On 22 Sep, Greg Stark wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> http://developer.osdl.org/markw/74/ > > Are those response times in the right unit? 7-10s? Yeah, the database really isn't tuned at all. I've gotten some suggestions off the list that I will be trying. I'll report them as I compl

Re: [HACKERS] More Prelimiary DBT-2 Test Results with PostgreSQL 7.3.4

2003-09-22 Thread Greg Stark
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > http://developer.osdl.org/markw/74/ Are those response times in the right unit? 7-10s? Are these mostly full table scans and big batch updates? Personally, I'm more interested in seeing OLTP-oriented benchmarks testing quick index based transactions in the 20-200ms

[HACKERS] More Prelimiary DBT-2 Test Results with PostgreSQL 7.3.4

2003-09-22 Thread markw
http://developer.osdl.org/markw/74/ I had a couple of hiccups doubling the database size, but I have results with proper linux kernel profile data now. The increase in database size has decreased the overall performance, as expected... I haven't had the opportunity to try different database para