Re: [HACKERS] Modified pg_dump & new pg_restore need testing...

2000-10-10 Thread Philip Warner
At 21:01 10/10/00 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: >Philip, where did we leave this? In CVS. ;-). The longer answer is that it's been in CVS for a while, and I have a version for 7.0.2 which I have also been using for a while. Various people have tested it, but not as many or as much as I would like

Re: [HACKERS] Modified pg_dump & new pg_restore need testing...

2000-10-10 Thread Bruce Momjian
Philip, where did we leave this? > > If anyone is interested in being sent the current sources for the new > pg_dump & pg_restore, please let me know. > > The utilities now seem to work, but need testing. > > The basic idea is to use pg_dump to dump an *entire* database, and then use > pg_rest