Re: [HACKERS] Misplaced BKI entries in pg_amproc.h

2014-01-31 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:14:43AM +0200, Antonin Houska wrote: > While checking something, I noticed that opfamilies 3626, 3683, 3901 > (all btree AM), 3903 (hash) and 3919 (gist) are all defined in the > section marked as "gin". > > (I'm not sure if it helps to deliver a patch - it may be easier

[HACKERS] Misplaced BKI entries in pg_amproc.h

2013-08-01 Thread Antonin Houska
While checking something, I noticed that opfamilies 3626, 3683, 3901 (all btree AM), 3903 (hash) and 3919 (gist) are all defined in the section marked as "gin". (I'm not sure if it helps to deliver a patch - it may be easier for the committer to move the items himself than to check if the diff