Re: [HACKERS] Minor changes to Recovery related code

2008-03-27 Thread Simon Riggs
Follow-up during March 2008 CommitFest On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 21:53 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 00:51 +0200, Florian G. Pflug wrote: > > Simon Riggs wrote: > > > On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 16:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > >> "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>> 2. pg_s

Re: [HACKERS] Minor changes to Recovery related code

2007-09-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
This has been saved for the 8.4 release: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold --- Simon Riggs wrote: > On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 00:51 +0200, Florian G. Pflug wrote: > > Simon Riggs wrote: > > > On Fri,

Re: [HACKERS] Minor changes to Recovery related code

2007-06-08 Thread Simon Riggs
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 21:53 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > We have a number of problems surrounding pg_stop_backup/shutdown: I'll start coding up my proposals, in the absence of alternate views. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -

Re: [HACKERS] Minor changes to Recovery related code

2007-06-07 Thread Simon Riggs
On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 00:51 +0200, Florian G. Pflug wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 16:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> 2. pg_stop_backup() should wait until all archive files are safely > >>> archived before returning > >> Not sur

Re: [HACKERS] Minor changes to Recovery related code

2007-04-12 Thread Jim Nasby
On Mar 30, 2007, at 5:51 PM, Florian G. Pflug wrote: In realitly, however, I feare that most people will just create a script that does 'echo "select pg_stop_backup | psql"' or something similar. If they're a bit more carefull, they will enable ON_ERROR_STOP, and check the return value of pgs

Re: [HACKERS] Minor changes to Recovery related code

2007-03-30 Thread Florian G. Pflug
Simon Riggs wrote: On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 16:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: 2. pg_stop_backup() should wait until all archive files are safely archived before returning Not sure I agree with that one. If it fails, you can't tell whether the action is done a

Re: [HACKERS] Minor changes to Recovery related code

2007-03-30 Thread Simon Riggs
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 16:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'd like to make the following changes to recovery related code over the > > next few days/weeks. If anybody insists I do this by freeze or not at > > all, then I'll submit patches for 1,3,4,5,10 befo

Re: [HACKERS] Minor changes to Recovery related code

2007-03-30 Thread Tom Lane
"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd like to make the following changes to recovery related code over the > next few days/weeks. If anybody insists I do this by freeze or not at > all, then I'll submit patches for 1,3,4,5,10 before Saturday night. I'd > rather take a bit more time and do

[HACKERS] Minor changes to Recovery related code

2007-03-30 Thread Simon Riggs
I'd like to make the following changes to recovery related code over the next few days/weeks. If anybody insists I do this by freeze or not at all, then I'll submit patches for 1,3,4,5,10 before Saturday night. I'd rather take a bit more time and do this in one drop and there are some code dependen