On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 03:23:44PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
>> > As I pondered this, I felt it would do better to solve a different problem.
>> > The "rm -rf" invocations presumably cre
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 03:23:44PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> > As I pondered this, I felt it would do better to solve a different problem.
> > The "rm -rf" invocations presumably crept in to reduce peak disk usage.
> > Considering the rel
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:59:55PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
>> > Solaris 10 ships Perl 5.8.4, and RHEL 5.11 ships Perl 5.8.8. Therefore,
>> > Perl
>> > installations lacking this File
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:59:55PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> > Solaris 10 ships Perl 5.8.4, and RHEL 5.11 ships Perl 5.8.8. Therefore,
> > Perl
> > installations lacking this File::Path feature will receive vendor support
> > for
> > yea
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> Solaris 10 ships Perl 5.8.4, and RHEL 5.11 ships Perl 5.8.8. Therefore, Perl
> installations lacking this File::Path feature will receive vendor support for
> years to come. Replacing the use of keep_root with rmtree+mkdir will add 2-10
> lines
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:29:36PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> David E. Wheeler wrote:
> > On Apr 14, 2015, at 1:21 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Castoroides has 5.8.4. Oops.
> >
> > WUT.
>
> Yeah, eh? Anyway I don't think it matters much: just don't enable TAP
> tests on machin
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 5:29 AM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> David E. Wheeler wrote:
>> On Apr 14, 2015, at 1:21 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>
>> > Castoroides has 5.8.4. Oops.
>>
>> WUT.
>
> Yeah, eh? Anyway I don't think it matters much: just don't enable TAP
> tests on machines with obsolete Perl
David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2015, at 1:21 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> > Castoroides has 5.8.4. Oops.
>
> WUT.
Yeah, eh? Anyway I don't think it matters much: just don't enable TAP
tests on machines with obsolete Perl. I think this is fine since 5.8's
latest release is supported.
On Apr 14, 2015, at 1:21 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Castoroides has 5.8.4. Oops.
WUT.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2015, at 9:05 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> >> http://perldoc.perl.org/File/Path.html
> >> With this formulation:
> >> remove_tree($tempdir, {keep_root => 1});
> >
> > Does Perl 5.8 have this?
>
> Yes, it does.
>
> http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/NWCLARK/p
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 09:25:33AM -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2015, at 9:05 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> >> http://perldoc.perl.org/File/Path.html
> >> With this formulation:
> >> remove_tree($tempdir, {keep_root => 1});
> >
> > Does Perl 5.8 have this?
>
> Yes, it does.
>
>
On Apr 14, 2015, at 9:05 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> http://perldoc.perl.org/File/Path.html
>> With this formulation:
>> remove_tree($tempdir, {keep_root => 1});
>
> Does Perl 5.8 have this?
Yes, it does.
http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/NWCLARK/perl-5.8.9/lib/File/Path.pm
Best,
David
smim
Michael Paquier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed that src/bin/initdb/t/001_initdb.pl uses directly rm via a
> system() call like that:
> system_or_bail "rm -rf '$tempdir'/*";
>
> This way of doing is not portable, particularly on platforms that do
> not have rm like... Windows where the equivalent
Hi all,
I noticed that src/bin/initdb/t/001_initdb.pl uses directly rm via a
system() call like that:
system_or_bail "rm -rf '$tempdir'/*";
This way of doing is not portable, particularly on platforms that do
not have rm like... Windows where the equivalent is del. And we could
actually use remov
14 matches
Mail list logo
