...
> Let me disable the administrative stuff being blocked and we'll see if it
> makes much of a difference in the way of 'false traffic' ...
Great! Thanks Marc.
- Thomas
Uh, just to confirm: you are removing administrative blocks, and also
removing any scanning of messages f
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > imho we should disable *any* special handling of posts to the mailing
> > > lists.
> >
> > It would be interesting to try that for awhile and see if the cure is
> > worse than th
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > imho we should disable *any* special handling of posts to the mailing
> > lists.
>
> It would be interesting to try that for awhile and see if the cure is
> worse than the disease or not. How many clueless "un
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > >
> > > > checking the moderator-to-approve listing for you, here are the reason(s):
> > > >
> > > > Reason: GLOBAL ADMIN HEADER: /^subjec
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> 2. Shouldn't the filter patterns be tightened up considerably? For
> example, I consider it sheer folly that I cannot use the word "c*ncel"
> in a Postgres discussion group without my posting being held up for
> several days.
I was wondering if we could i
Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> imho we should disable *any* special handling of posts to the mailing
> lists.
It would be interesting to try that for awhile and see if the cure is
worse than the disease or not. How many clueless "uns*bscr*be" requests
will hit the lists if there a
> > > The fact this is done silently is clearly unacceptable.
> > Agreed. Curiously, though, I've always gotten notifications whenever
> > any of my messages got held up for moderator approval. Seems like there
> > are two questions for Marc here:
> > 1. Why is the system failing to notify some
> > The fact this is done silently is clearly unacceptable.
>
> Agreed. Curiously, though, I've always gotten notifications whenever
> any of my messages got held up for moderator approval. Seems like there
> are two questions for Marc here:
>
> 1. Why is the system failing to notify some peopl
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>> I've always has this suspicion that every time I send an email with 'SET
>> NULL' in the subject it doesn't get through!!! I've even commented on that
>> on the list before!
> The fact this is done silently is clearly
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > checking the moderator-to-approve listing for you, here are the reason(s):
> >
> > Reason: GLOBAL ADMIN HEADER: /^subject:\s*set\b/i matched "Subject: SET"
>
> OH MY GOD!!!
>
> I've always has this suspicion that every time I send an email with 'SET
> NULL' in
> checking the moderator-to-approve listing for you, here are the reason(s):
>
> Reason: GLOBAL ADMIN HEADER: /^subject:\s*set\b/i matched "Subject: SET"
OH MY GOD!!!
I've always has this suspicion that every time I send an email with 'SET
NULL' in the subject it doesn't get through!!! I've eve
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > >
> > > checking the moderator-to-approve listing for you, here are the reason(s):
> > >
> > > Reason: GLOBAL ADMIN HEADER: /^subject:\s*set\b/i matched "Subject: SET"
> > OK, but should poster
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > checking the moderator-to-approve listing for you, here are the reason(s):
> >
> > Reason: GLOBAL ADMIN HEADER: /^subject:\s*set\b/i matched "Subject: SET"
> >
>
> OK, but should posters get email stating it is in the app
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> checking the moderator-to-approve listing for you, here are the reason(s):
>
> Reason: GLOBAL ADMIN HEADER: /^subject:\s*set\b/i matched "Subject: SET"
>
OK, but should posters get email stating it is in the approval queue?
He clearly didn't, and I don't either, but
checking the moderator-to-approve listing for you, here are the reason(s):
Reason: GLOBAL ADMIN HEADER: /^subject:\s*set\b/i matched "Subject: SET"
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> I just sent in this email and it will appear immediately in the list.
>
> Somewhat earlier,
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> I just sent in this email and it will appear immediately in the list.
>
> Somewhat earlier, I have submitted a 25kb patch and then a 5kb gzipped
> version of that patch to -hackers and -patches - it has not yet appeared on
> the list.
>
> What's going on? Do pos
I just sent in this email and it will appear immediately in the list.
Somewhat earlier, I have submitted a 25kb patch and then a 5kb gzipped
version of that patch to -hackers and -patches - it has not yet appeared on
the list.
What's going on? Do posts with patches need to be approved or someth
17 matches
Mail list logo
