Re: [HACKERS] MS interview

2001-08-16 Thread Mathijs Brands
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 10:39:24AM +0200, John Anderson allegedly wrote: > AFAIK, OLAP backends essentially provide a cache of denormalised data > that provide fast access (no need to re-run complex queries) to large > data sets, and a set of aggregate functions to analyse the data. > > There's a

Re: [HACKERS] MS interview

2001-08-15 Thread John Anderson
Gavin Sherry wrote: > Seems like a fairly large amount of talk about stuff which should be taken > care of internally by corporations who have such interests. Not entirely. As a freelancer, I've used OLAP (front-end only, ie pivot tables in Excel) to help me produce invoices from my timesheet

RE: [HACKERS] MS interview

2001-08-14 Thread Gavin Sherry
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Mark Pritchard wrote: > > The longer that Oracle, MS, et al don't believe we're a threat, the > > better. But I wonder how they *really* see us. This article was > > too obviously a pile of marketing BS to be taken seriously by > > anyone. > > Not necessarily - business gu

Re: [HACKERS] MS interview

2001-08-14 Thread Bruce Momjian
> Hopefully, RedHat's involvement will boost the mindshare and image of > PostgreSQL and I don't have to keep doing Oracle admin :) We had four articles in one day today. That shows some major momentum. -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [HACKERS] MS interview

2001-08-14 Thread Mark Pritchard
> The longer that Oracle, MS, et al don't believe we're a threat, the > better. But I wonder how they *really* see us. This article was > too obviously a pile of marketing BS to be taken seriously by > anyone. Not necessarily - business guys are incredibly naive when it comes to technology opti

Re: [HACKERS] MS interview

2001-08-14 Thread Tom Lane
Tim Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Near the end he gets specifically asked about "Red Hat Database" as a > competitive threat, and he responds that he doesn't think anyone can match > their "investment" of "800 professionals" to work on SQL Server. ROTFL ... The longer that Oracle, MS, et a

Re: [HACKERS] MS interview

2001-08-14 Thread Dwayne Miller
I'm sure that "800 professionals" equates to something like 4 developers, 1 tester (part-time), 2 documentation specialist, and 792 marketing, sales, administration, legal staff and others required to justify its cost, and 1 CEO who has his fingers into everything at MS. Tim Allen wrote: >Th

RE: [HACKERS] MS interview

2001-08-14 Thread Gavin Sherry
; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Allen > > Sent: Wednesday, 15 August 2001 8:50 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [HACKERS] MS interview > > > > > > > > The Register has an interesting interview with the vp

RE: [HACKERS] MS interview

2001-08-14 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
What is OLAP and why is it so good? (According to MS) Chris > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Allen > Sent: Wednesday, 15 August 2001 8:50 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [HACKERS] MS interview > >

[HACKERS] MS interview

2001-08-14 Thread Tim Allen
The Register has an interesting interview with the vp of Microsoft's SQL Server team: http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/53/21003.html Near the end he gets specifically asked about "Red Hat Database" as a competitive threat, and he responds that he doesn't think anyone can match their "invest