On Nov 16, 2005, at 15:37 , Michael Glaesemann wrote:
I'm using per-branch configurations, but missed HEAD. I'll get that
fixed. Thanks for the catch.
Back to normal:
http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=wallaroo&dt=2005-11-16%
2009:12:09
Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com
On Nov 16, 2005, at 13:53 , Tom Lane wrote:
[ looks at buildfarm... ] It looks like you dropped the extra options
on all of wallaroo's branches, which is not good. They should work in
8.0 and later, and you should test 'em where they're claimed to work.
[looks at build-farm.conf, blushes] A
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 11:53:11PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Nov 15, 2005, at 23:19 , Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Apparently you don't get to have --enable-nls either :-(
>
> > And we've got green! :)
> > http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=w
Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Nov 15, 2005, at 23:19 , Tom Lane wrote:
>> Apparently you don't get to have --enable-nls either :-(
> And we've got green! :)
> http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=wallaroo&dt=2005-11-15%
> 2022:55:15
> Thanks, Tom, for taking the tim
On Nov 15, 2005, at 23:19 , Tom Lane wrote:
Apparently you don't get to have --enable-nls either :-(
And we've got green! :)
http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=wallaroo&dt=2005-11-15%
2022:55:15
Thanks, Tom, for taking the time to look at this and explaining it a
bit to me.
Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Makes sense. I've stripped --with-openssl, and --with-tcl and --with-
> python for good measure. It still fails, and to my eye, with the same
> failure.
Much smaller list of symbols though:
ld: Undefined symbols:
_bindtextdomain
_dgettext
Appar
On Nov 15, 2005, at 12:20 , Tom Lane wrote:
In particular,
we presently have no idea whether wallaroo would expose any other
contrib problems if it were able to get past building dblink;
and the fact that it's red and always has been red discourages
people from noticing if the failure changes t
Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for the explanation. Is making this change to the build farm
> machine's config worth doing? Is it more useful on the build farm to
> see what works, or to see what fails? I'm thinking the latter. It'd
> be nice to see green, but green f
On Nov 15, 2005, at 11:34 , Tom Lane wrote:
Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The 7.4 tree has never built cleanly on Wallaroo, a Mac OS X 10.3.8
member of the build farm. Currently it's failing in the make contrib
stage.
I believe you could get 7.4 contrib to build if you ta
Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The 7.4 tree has never built cleanly on Wallaroo, a Mac OS X 10.3.8
> member of the build farm. Currently it's failing in the make contrib
> stage.
I'm afraid 7.4 will probably never build completely cleanly on OS X.
The failure you're showing i
The 7.4 tree has never built cleanly on Wallaroo, a Mac OS X 10.3.8
member of the build farm. Currently it's failing in the make contrib
stage. I'd like to get it to build properly, but I don't know enough
to be able to make sense of the log output. I'd be grateful if
someone could spare a
11 matches
Mail list logo
