Re: [HACKERS] Logical Decoding follows timelines

2015-04-21 Thread Simon Riggs
On 21 April 2015 at 05:49, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > > Moved patch to CF 2015-02 to not lose track of it, also because it does > not > > seem it received a proper review. > > This patch does not apply anymore, so attached is a rebased versi

Re: [HACKERS] Logical Decoding follows timelines

2015-04-20 Thread Michael Paquier
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > Moved patch to CF 2015-02 to not lose track of it, also because it does not > seem it received a proper review. This patch does not apply anymore, so attached is a rebased version. The comments mentioned here have not been addressed: http:/

Re: [HACKERS] Logical Decoding follows timelines

2015-02-12 Thread Michael Paquier
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Simon Riggs wrote: > On 16 December 2014 at 21:17, Simon Riggs wrote: > > >>> This patch is a WIP version of doing that, but only currently attempts > > >> With the patch, XLogSendLogical uses the same logic to calculate > SendRqstPtr > >> that XLogSendPhysical d

Re: [HACKERS] Logical Decoding follows timelines

2015-01-16 Thread Andres Freund
On 2015-01-03 12:07:29 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > >@@ -941,6 +936,8 @@ StartLogicalReplication(StartReplicationCmd *cmd) > > * Force a disconnect, so that the decoding code doesn't need to care > > * about an eventual switch from running in recovery, to running in a > > * nor

Re: [HACKERS] Logical Decoding follows timelines

2015-01-03 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
On 12/17/2014 10:35 AM, Simon Riggs wrote: On 16 December 2014 at 21:17, Simon Riggs wrote: This patch is a WIP version of doing that, but only currently attempts With the patch, XLogSendLogical uses the same logic to calculate SendRqstPtr that XLogSendPhysical does. It would be good to ref

Re: [HACKERS] Logical Decoding follows timelines

2014-12-17 Thread Simon Riggs
On 16 December 2014 at 21:17, Simon Riggs wrote: >>> This patch is a WIP version of doing that, but only currently attempts >> With the patch, XLogSendLogical uses the same logic to calculate SendRqstPtr >> that XLogSendPhysical does. It would be good to refactor that into a common >> function,

Re: [HACKERS] Logical Decoding follows timelines

2014-12-16 Thread Simon Riggs
On 16 December 2014 at 14:25, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 12/15/2014 08:54 PM, Simon Riggs wrote: >> >> Currently, it doesn't. >> >> This patch is a WIP version of doing that, but only currently attempts >> to do this in the WALSender. >> >> Objective is to allow cascaded logical replication. >

Re: [HACKERS] Logical Decoding follows timelines

2014-12-16 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
On 12/15/2014 08:54 PM, Simon Riggs wrote: Currently, it doesn't. This patch is a WIP version of doing that, but only currently attempts to do this in the WALSender. Objective is to allow cascaded logical replication. Very WIP, but here for comments. With the patch, XLogSendLogical uses the

[HACKERS] Logical Decoding follows timelines

2014-12-15 Thread Simon Riggs
Currently, it doesn't. This patch is a WIP version of doing that, but only currently attempts to do this in the WALSender. Objective is to allow cascaded logical replication. Very WIP, but here for comments. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development,