Robert Treat wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 16:41, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Czuczy Gergely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > It would be very nice to create a way to log only bad queries, which's
> > > > resulted in an error. This way a higher loglevel wouldn't be necessary.
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 16:41, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Czuczy Gergely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > It would be very nice to create a way to log only bad queries, which's
> > > resulted in an error. This way a higher loglevel wouldn't be necessary.
> >
> > We have that (might
Tom Lane wrote:
> Czuczy Gergely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It would be very nice to create a way to log only bad queries, which's
> > resulted in an error. This way a higher loglevel wouldn't be necessary.
>
> We have that (might be new for 7.4, I forget).
Yes, new for 7.4: log_min_error_s
Czuczy Gergely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It would be very nice to create a way to log only bad queries, which's
> resulted in an error. This way a higher loglevel wouldn't be necessary.
We have that (might be new for 7.4, I forget).
> i've made some store functions in C, and it would be very
Hello
It would be very nice to create a way to log only bad queries, which's
resulted in an error. This way a higher loglevel wouldn't be necessary.
one other thing,
by sending a SIGHUP to the postmaster it reinits it's config files. Now
i've made some store functions in C, and it would be very n
