Re: [HACKERS] Library versioning

2000-09-19 Thread Michael Meskes
On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 11:17:19AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > If you re-order an exported emum you are going to complete break binary > compatibility, either bump the major or add the entries at the end. The later is what I did so far. > However there's another problem even if you add at t

Re: [HACKERS] Library versioning

2000-09-18 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000918 05:03] wrote: > If I change some stuff in a library that forces the user to recompile all > programs because it's not binary compatible I have to change the major > number right? But just changing the order in an enum datatype does not > exactly look li

[HACKERS] Library versioning

2000-09-18 Thread Michael Meskes
If I change some stuff in a library that forces the user to recompile all programs because it's not binary compatible I have to change the major number right? But just changing the order in an enum datatype does not exactly look like such a big change. But the only way to avoid this problem is add