Re: [HACKERS] LOCK_DEBUG breaks compile in 8.2 (and possibly later)

2006-12-12 Thread Tom Lane
Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just noticed that defining LOCK_DEBUG causes a compile failure Still another demonstration that Bruce's approach to removing "unused" #includes does not work. Patched in HEAD ... regards, tom lane ---(

[HACKERS] LOCK_DEBUG breaks compile in 8.2 (and possibly later)

2006-12-12 Thread Mark Kirkwood
I just noticed that defining LOCK_DEBUG causes a compile failure (have not delved into how to fix, but thought it would be worth noting at this point!): gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -fno-strict-aliasing -g -I. -I../..