On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Ashutosh Bapat writes:
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Michael Paquier
>> wrote:
>>> Per explain.c, this looks inconsistent to me. Shouldn't NULLS LAST be
>>> applied only if DESC is used in this ORDER BY clause?
>
>> ... In this case we are
Ashutosh Bapat writes:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
>> Per explain.c, this looks inconsistent to me. Shouldn't NULLS LAST be
>> applied only if DESC is used in this ORDER BY clause?
> ... In this case we are constructing a query to be
> sent to the foreign server an
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks Rajkumar for your report. Let me know if the attached patch fixes
> >> the issue.
>
> if
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Rajkumar for your report. Let me know if the attached patch fixes
>> the issue.
if (pathkey->pk_nulls_first)
appendStringInfoString(buf, " NULL
Thanks Ashutosh. Retested the issue after applying given patch,It is fine
now.
Thanks & Regards,
Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
QMG, EnterpriseDB Corporation
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Ashutosh Bapat <
ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Thanks Rajkumar for your report. Let me know if the attac
Thanks Rajkumar for your report. Let me know if the attached patch fixes
the issue.
The code did not add NULL LAST clause the case when pk_nulls_first is false
in pathkey. PFA the fix for the same. I have also added few tests to
postgres_fdw.sql for few combinations of asc/desc and nulls first/las
Hi,
I am testing postgres_fdw sort pushdown feature for PostgreSQL 9.6 DB, and
I observed below issue.
*Observation: *If giving nulls last option with the order by clause as
'desc nulls last', remote query is not considering nulls last and giving
wrong result in 9.6 version. while in 9.5 it is gi