http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=7966
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 22:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > After failing to make Itanium competitive, Intel is now downplaying
> > 64-bit CPU's. Of course, they didn't think that until Itanium failed.
> > Here is the slashdot story:
> > http://slashdot.o
> After failing to make Itanium competitive, Intel is now downplaying
> 64-bit CPU's. Of course, they didn't think that until Itanium failed.
> Here is the slashdot story:
> http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/02/23/2050237&mode=nested&tid=118
>
> Seems AMD's hammer is going to be the popular
After failing to make Itanium competitive, Intel is now downplaying
64-bit CPU's. Of course, they didn't think that until Itanium failed.
Here is the slashdot story:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/02/23/2050237&mode=nested&tid=118
Seems AMD's hammer is going to be the popular 64
