Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> Did we ever come to a conclusion on what to do with integer datetimes on
>>> msvc for 8.3?
>>>
>>> For the uninformed - 8.2 and earlier had the binary build with floating
>>> point timestamps, 8.3 has integer timestamps
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Did we ever come to a conclusion on what to do with integer datetimes on
>> msvc for 8.3?
>>
>> For the uninformed - 8.2 and earlier had the binary build with floating
>> point timestamps, 8.3 has integer timestamps. (We're just talking the
>>
On Dec 3, 2007, at 11:27 , Tom Lane wrote:
I believe we have consensus that 8.4 is the time to do that --- see
thread here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-05/msg00046.php
Is there anything in the release notes (or elsewhere) for 8.3 that
mention this as the intention, si
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Did we ever come to a conclusion on what to do with integer datetimes on
msvc for 8.3?
For the uninformed - 8.2 and earlier had the binary build with floating
point timestamps, 8.3 has integer timestamps. (We're just talking the
binary build here)
If you are prepa
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Did we ever come to a conclusion on what to do with integer datetimes on
> msvc for 8.3?
> For the uninformed - 8.2 and earlier had the binary build with floating
> point timestamps, 8.3 has integer timestamps. (We're just talking the
> binary build he
Did we ever come to a conclusion on what to do with integer datetimes on
msvc for 8.3?
For the uninformed - 8.2 and earlier had the binary build with floating
point timestamps, 8.3 has integer timestamps. (We're just talking the
binary build here)
//Magnus
---(end of broa
