On 13 November 2012 01:25, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Attached is a piece I wrote on the feature. That might form the basis
> of a new wiki page.
Since no one else moved on this, I've completely replaced the existing
page with the contents of the user-orientated document I posted. I
don't believe t
On 13 November 2012 16:37, Robert Haas wrote:
> I found this an interesting read. As one of the people who worked on
> the feature, I'm sort of curious whether people have any experience
> yet with how this actually shakes out in the field. Are you (or is
> anyone) aware of positive/negative fie
On 13 November 2012 16:37, Robert Haas wrote:
> I found this an interesting read. As one of the people who worked on
> the feature, I'm sort of curious whether people have any experience
> yet with how this actually shakes out in the field. Are you (or is
> anyone) aware of positive/negative fie
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On 13 November 2012 01:03, Jeff Janes wrote:
>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Index-only_scans
>>
>> This page is seriously out of date. It suggests they are not yet
>> implemented, but only being talked about.
>
> Attached is a piece
On 13 November 2012 01:03, Jeff Janes wrote:
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Index-only_scans
>
> This page is seriously out of date. It suggests they are not yet
> implemented, but only being talked about.
Attached is a piece I wrote on the feature. That might form the basis
of a new wiki pa
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Index-only_scans
This page is seriously out of date. It suggests they are not yet
implemented, but only being talked about.
Would someone who knows a lot about the subject (which is why I'm
sending this hackers, not web) like to take a whack at updating this?
O
