Tom Lane wrote:
> Are you sure you're reading that correctly?
Not anymore... :-/ Sorry for the noise. I had remembered that in some
context and were
interchangeable, but apparently I got it all mixed up.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> SQL99 part 2 clause 16.1 contains this note:
> NOTE 327 - The characteristics of a transaction begun by a
> are as specified in these General
> Rules regardless of the characteristics specified by any
> preceding . That is, even if one
SQL99 part 2 clause 16.1 contains this note:
NOTE 327 - The characteristics of a transaction begun by a
are as specified in these General
Rules regardless of the characteristics specified by any
preceding . That is, even if one
or more characteristics are omitted by the , the
