Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistency between postgresql.conf and docs

2011-07-07 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut writes: > On tor, 2011-07-07 at 13:26 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> OK, so the plan is to move these settings into a separate top-level >> group "Replication", and sub-divide into master and standby settings, > Most of the messages use the term "primary" rather than "master". I > th

Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistency between postgresql.conf and docs

2011-07-07 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On tor, 2011-07-07 at 13:26 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > OK, so the plan is to move these settings into a separate top-level > group "Replication", and sub-divide into master and standby settings, Most of the messages use the term "primary" rather than "master". I think there was a discussion in 9.0

Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistency between postgresql.conf and docs

2011-07-07 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Fujii Masao writes: >> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: >>> My preference would be to have: >>> >>> # REPLICATION >>> >>> # - Master Settings - >>> # these settings affect the master role in replication >>> # they will be ignor

Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistency between postgresql.conf and docs

2011-07-07 Thread Tom Lane
Fujii Masao writes: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: >> My preference would be to have: >> >> # REPLICATION >> >> # - Master Settings - >> # these settings affect the master role in replication >> # they will be ignored on the standby >> >> ... settings ... >> >> # - Stan

Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistency between postgresql.conf and docs

2011-07-05 Thread Fujii Masao
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: > My preference would be to have: > > # REPLICATION > > # - Master Settings - > # these settings affect the master role in replication > # they will be ignored on the standby > > ... settings ... > > # - Standby Settings - > # these settings affe

Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistency between postgresql.conf and docs

2011-06-29 Thread Josh Berkus
> I don't have a strong feeling on whether or not we should put that > setting in its own section. Right now, we only have one setting for > synchronous replication, so I guess maybe it depends on if we think > there will be more in the future. I believe there will be more in the future. Howev

Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistency between postgresql.conf and docs

2011-06-29 Thread Robert Haas
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > But in the sample file, the "synchronous_standby_names" parameter is the > first parameter under the heading "- Streaming Replication - Server > Settings" while in the documentation, that parameter has its own > subsection 18.5.5 after the "st

[HACKERS] Inconsistency between postgresql.conf and docs

2011-06-28 Thread Josh Berkus
All, A tester correctly reported this: But in the sample file, the "synchronous_standby_names" parameter is the first parameter under the heading "- Streaming Replication - Server Settings" while in the documentation, that parameter has its own subsection 18.5.5 after the "streaming rep