On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Was that a backend that you directly killed? Or the postmaster? The
> subsequent connection failures suggest it was the postmaster. Killing
> the postmaster is not a supported operation, not on Windows and not
> anywhere else either. It's in
Michael Paquier writes:
> While playing on Windows with services, I noticed an inconsistent behavior
> in the way failures are handled when using a service for a Postgres
> instance.
> ...
> However when a backend process is directly killed something different
> happens.
Was that a backend that y
Hi all,
While playing on Windows with services, I noticed an inconsistent behavior
in the way failures are handled when using a service for a Postgres
instance.
Let's assume that there is a service called postgres that has been
registered:
$ psql -At -c 'select version()'
PostgreSQL 9.5devel, com
