Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistencies in documentation of row-level locking

2014-11-13 Thread Michael Paquier
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Thanks, I applied it to master and 9.4 after some slight > editorialization. Thanks. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpre

Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistencies in documentation of row-level locking

2014-11-13 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Michael Paquier wrote: > Hi all, > > Currently all the row-level lock modes are described in the page for > SELECT query: > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/explicit-locking.html#LOCKING-ROWS > However, after browsing the documentation, I noticed in the page > describing all the explici

Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistencies in documentation of row-level locking

2014-10-21 Thread Michael Paquier
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Jim Nasby wrote: > Did this get committed? Should probably add it to the commitfest if not... > Already done in CF3, I should have mentioned it: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1594 -- Michael

Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistencies in documentation of row-level locking

2014-10-20 Thread Jim Nasby
On 10/10/14, 8:31 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: Hi all, Currently all the row-level lock modes are described in the page for SELECT query: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/explicit-locking.html#LOCKING-ROWS However, after browsing the documentation, I noticed in the page describing all t

[HACKERS] Inconsistencies in documentation of row-level locking

2014-10-10 Thread Michael Paquier
Hi all, Currently all the row-level lock modes are described in the page for SELECT query: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/explicit-locking.html#LOCKING-ROWS However, after browsing the documentation, I noticed in the page describing all the explicit locks of the system that there is a