On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:54 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> With respect to this particular thing, it's hard for me to imagine
>> that anything will go wrong on ppcle that we wouldn't consider a
>> back-patchable fix, so there might be no harm in adjusting
>> config.guess and config.
Robert Haas writes:
> With respect to this particular thing, it's hard for me to imagine
> that anything will go wrong on ppcle that we wouldn't consider a
> back-patchable fix, so there might be no harm in adjusting
> config.guess and config.sub.
FWIW, I also suspect that supporting ppc64le woul
Hi Tom
With --build=powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu in the config_opts section
of build-farm.conf,
the build and the regression were successful.
Well, by the time the decision is made on this, I have enabled only 9.4+
runs on ppc64le. The results from this buildfarm member 'clam' are now
being repo
On 12/8/15 1:06 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> I don't really want to get into an argument about this, but is the
> reason we haven't updated config.guess and config.sub in the past that
> it presents an actual stability risk, or just that nobody's asked
> before? Because the first one is a good reason
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> I don't really want to get into an argument about this, but is the
>> reason we haven't updated config.guess and config.sub in the past that
>> it presents an actual stability risk, or just that nobody's asked
>> before? Be
Robert Haas writes:
> I don't really want to get into an argument about this, but is the
> reason we haven't updated config.guess and config.sub in the past that
> it presents an actual stability risk, or just that nobody's asked
> before? Because the first one is a good reason not to do it now,
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>> So, config.guess should be changed to include the build type for ppc64le
>>> like it is in 9.4+ branches.
>>
>> So far as I can tell from a quick troll of the git history, we have never
>> ever updated config.guess/config.sub in released b
On 12/08/2015 10:27 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Sandeep Thakkar writes:
So, config.guess should be changed to include the build type for ppc64le
like it is in 9.4+ branches.
So far as I can tell from a quick troll of the git history, we have never
ever updated config.guess/config.sub in released bra
Sandeep Thakkar writes:
> So, config.guess should be changed to include the build type for ppc64le
> like it is in 9.4+ branches.
So far as I can tell from a quick troll of the git history, we have never
ever updated config.guess/config.sub in released branches. I'm a bit
hesitant to do it in th
Hi
We have registered two new buildfarm animals for RHEL 7 on PPC64 and
PPC64LE (Little Endian). The configure for 9.3, 9.2 and 9.1 failed on
ppc64le with the error "error: cannot guess build type; you must specify
one". This is because config.guess for these branches don't expect the arch
to be p
10 matches
Mail list logo
