On 6/12/05, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I believe this isn't just my problem. Without access to a the
> > underlying column's DEFAULT, how can people implement the automated
> > WRITEable VIEWs?
>
> That's a reasonable question, but translati
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 11:48:29PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I believe this isn't just my problem. Without access to a the
> > underlying column's DEFAULT, how can people implement the automated
> > WRITEable VIEWs?
>
> That's a reasonable question, but
On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 20:33 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 10:56:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > At one time, INSERTing a NULL into a column with a DEFAULT used to
> > > INSERT the DEFAULT. Is there some way to get this behavior
David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I believe this isn't just my problem. Without access to a the
> underlying column's DEFAULT, how can people implement the automated
> WRITEable VIEWs?
That's a reasonable question, but translating "insert null" to "insert
the default" is not a reasonable
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 10:56:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > At one time, INSERTing a NULL into a column with a DEFAULT used to
> > INSERT the DEFAULT. Is there some way to get this behavior back?
>
> PG has *never* done that in any version that I can r
David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At one time, INSERTing a NULL into a column with a DEFAULT used to
> INSERT the DEFAULT. Is there some way to get this behavior back?
PG has *never* done that in any version that I can recall, and it isn't
likely that we would install such an obvious vio
Folks,
At one time, INSERTing a NULL into a column with a DEFAULT used to
INSERT the DEFAULT. Is there some way to get this behavior back? I
think that this is a bug introduced by removing the NULL -> DEFAULT
behavior and not replacing it somehow. Below is a simple repro.
I think this is a bug
